User talk:The Brain

Hi, you can talk to me here!
I'm new to editing Wikipedia, (06,Jan,2005) so please don't mistake my edits for vandalism or opinion. I'm working on developing a NPOV. Update 2012: I haven't made any edetorial edits lately. I mainly added arabic text.

Current time: Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 22:36 (UTC)

Leave a new message

Female Circumcision

The edits you made to Female Circumcision seem to support your belief that the practice is not supported by the Quran more than they support the article's flow and NPOV. I'm not reverting the edits, but you might go back and see if there is another place to put your information. The paragraph in which you put your edits was originally intended to show that many African Muslims, including clerics, believe that the Qu'ran demands sunna. Would you please go back and make sure that both your position "only ignorant Muslims believe in sunna" and the position of North African-- especially rural Egyptian-- Muslims are both fairly represented?

Thanks!

--Defenestrate 16:52, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Added a more NPOV. I think my use of jargon was confusing. --The Brain 01:46, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)

Please vote

Please consider voting at:

Wikipedia:Conspiracy_theory

to rename articles that use the pejorative term "Conspiracy theory" to denigrate the content of the article.

Do the titles of WP articles generally pass partisan judgment on the subject under discussion? Should they? BrandonYusufToropov 02:59, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- thanks for voting -- I'd like to send you a message offline

Can you please email me at yusuf.toropov@gmail.com?

Peace,

BYT

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Alphax ^τεχ 17:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Barnstar

For your hard work transliterating the suras of the Qur'an.

And for your transliteration of dozens (hundreds?) more articles!

The Brain,

Great job adding the Arabic to those suras! The articles really needed it. Thanks also for your touchups to those articles. Keep up the good work! – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 13:05, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

And again, your hard work is inspiring! Thanks for doing the grunt work that most of us aren't able to do. My hat's off to you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 12:58, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

Reversions

Hello. I looked at the page you mentioned, and I agree that the verse you added helps the article, so I put the verse back in. I also left a note on the article's talk page Talk:Women in Islam saying why I put the verse back in. If Lao Wai disagrees, hopefully he will discuss it there instead of reverting again.

Sometimes people remove changes I make, and it's always frustrating, but there are some good ways to handle it. One good way is to ask an experienced user for help, which is what you did. Another good idea is to leave a message on the article's talk page explaining why you think the person's change was a bad idea, and saying that you plan to change the article back in a few days if no one objects. It's important to be polite and not insulting when you do so. Say "I think this wording would be better" instead of "You are discrediting the Qur'an!", for instance.

To revert, click the "history" tab to see the page's history. Then click on the date of the better version, and you will see this older version of the article. Then click the "Edit" tab, and you will be editing the previous version. You don't have to make any changes - just leave an edit summary saying that you're reverting, and explaining why. It will save the old version over the newer one. That's how you revert. If you have problems with this, let me know.

Thanks, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 04:34, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

Baphomet

Baphomet is being sneaky. There is no user with the name User:Baphomet. That's why no edits show up in the user history. His actual username is User:WholemealBaphomet. His sig file signs the wrong name, but you can find out the user's real name by looking at the edit history of a page he edited. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:29, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

BC, AD, BCE, CE, AH, etc

There has been lots of debate on what date format to use, and Wikipedia has been unable to agree on a standard. Because of this, new articles can use whatever date format is appropriate, but they ask that no one go through and change a bunch of articles.

About Arabic -> English translators, I've wanted one of those for a long time. Apparently there isn't a good one on the Internet, sadly. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:37, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Can I edit your comment in Talk:Fatwa?

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the Talk:Fatwa page. Is it ok if I merge "Who can issue a fatwa?" with "Who can issue a Fatwa:" and also edit your answer to the following:

Being born and raised Muslim Sunni and having been a Sufi of North African Tariqas for 12 years I think I can answer this, I can go to a Cleric and ask him a mundane question about ritual purity and technically it's a Fatwa. More complicated issues like, is Sulman Rusdie attacking the religion therefore it's ok to kill him takes a scholar to answer. Now a Fatwa is merely an OPINON or an interpretation of a Qur'anic passage, and it is NOT binding. So when I watch a Jihadist on TV, he's no scholar or any of that, say: kill, you know where he's coming from. While he is entitled to his opinion, which might Technically qualify as a Fatwa, he's no scholar, and the Fatwa has little impact if any.

? Thanks, Andjam 08:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You might be interested in these . Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild , & Category:Muslim Wikipedians .

Peace . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 23:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also , if you are interested in Sufism , we are planning to start an article on History of Sufism , with a section on Sufism in North Africa . So you might be able to help us . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال}^/c 23:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

North African Sufism is different from Persian and Turkish Tariqas because the practitioners are native speakerss of Arabic , so it relies heavily on prayers that are border-line magical, I'll try it when someone starts an article about it.--The Brain 03:19, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Islam and Slavery

I've had a look at the article for deletion page, and the discussion seems to be fairly civilised. I don't think I need to contribute to it. Andjam 11:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article vote is over, and it seems to be leaning to merge. If you (as the creator of the article) could merge it, it would be appreciated. Yuber^(talk) 15:15, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you can take a look at this

[[1]] BrandonYusufToropov 23:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American terrorism

This AfD is now closed. Please stop editing the discussion. Thanks. Carbonite | Talk 17:42, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hosni Mubarak

Yes, it's probably politically motivated. I'll keep an eye on it. – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 00:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know. The article needs cleaning too. Don't worry about this. We can find a way to make this less problematic later. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal pending at 9/11 conspiracy theories

I have officially proposed to split the 9/11 conspiracy theories article, with the two most in depth areas being moved to separate articles at Allegations of Jewish or Israeli complicity in 9/11 and Allegations of U.S. government complicity in 9/11. I feel this will help alleviate the problem of the main article being too large and allow these two distinct concepts to be discussed in depth separately. Further division may be in order in the future, but I feel this is an important first step. Please check out the discussion at Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories#Proposal_to_split_this_article. Thank you. Blackcats 04:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hosni Mubarak

Just not enough edits to protect. Sorry. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 14:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I've been following your edit history on the Mubarak page and I need to ask you: What the hell do you have against Mubarak? I don't know if you are Egyptian or not; if you're not then don't believe all you see in Al Jazeera and others since they emphasize the negative because it attracts more viewers. Furthermore, you don't live in Egypt and hence cannot accurately judge the situation.

On the other hand, if you ARE Egyptian,which you probably are, you know very well that Egypt was transformed in the last twenty years. If you compare statistics of life expectancy, communications, and electricity from 1981 till now, they have sky rocketed. Look at Egypt following Sadat: a president has just been assassinated, economic conditions were so bad that people rioted when the price of bread went up by 5 cents a couple of years earlier, and at that time we hadn't yet got Taba back from the Israelis (which by the way was accomplished under Mubarak) I completely agree with you: the state of democracy SUCKS in Egypt, and a lot more needs to be done. Poverty and unemployment still persist and frankly speaking, when you sit with people in Egypt, there is likely to be a lot of complaints about the state of affairs in Egypt. But if you're Egyptian, there's improvement and you know it: turn to any of the unofficial newspapers and criticism of the president and his son is there like it has never been before.

Please be objective when editing. For example, I am an Egyptian Christian and am proud that the January 7th day was delcared a national holiday by President Mubarak, which you just ERASED, instead choosing to italicize "three" years to highlight how much time it took for Mubarak to release Pope Shenouda from exile.

In conclusion, please try to be objective when editing this page. Thanks.

"Conspiracy theory" title neutrality proposal 2.0 voting has begun

See here and Wikipedia:Title Neutrality. zen master T 20:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

African Sufism

Can you give a link to any site that tels about African flavour of Sufism . Living in Pakistan , I never get any info about african Sufi practices . Thanks . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 19:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Kursi wiki 216x210.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kursi wiki 216x210.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I WONDER IF....

As per your comment that a pic of Mohammed would 'offend' Muslims, I wonder if you'd extend the same courtesy to Christians or Jews? I doubt it somehow, Atheists tend to be totally one sided in their love of Islam and hatred of Christianity.

Image use policy on user pages

Please be aware that our image use policy prohibits the use of unlicensed media on your user page. As such, I am removing the image of Pinky and the Brain from your user page as it is not licensed for that use. This policy is required to comply with copyright law and with Wikipedia's general principles regarding copyright. Please do not replace the image. Kelly Martin (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Benenson_190.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Benenson_190.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Return (guerrilla organization)

The Arabic you added to that page was actually incorrect...AnonMoos 16:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom fishing Finance

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage

Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pinky and the Brain.jpg

Hello, The Brain. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Pinky and the Brain.jpg) was found at the following location: User:The Brain. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Kifaya.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kifaya.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory titles

I would appreciate any help you could provide with the new Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory titles proposal/essay and also over on wiktionary's definition of "conspiracy theory" here. zen master T 23:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kifaya-2005-06-09.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kifaya-2005-06-09.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:13, 13 November 2007 (UT)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tariqa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hadra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beurger King Muslim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beurger King Muslim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beurger King Muslim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]