User talk:Archenzo

███████ 5 November - 04:06 (UTC)

Hallo, I am Italian. I live in Milan.

Please contact me in my italian talk page

Hi Archenzo, I saw your changes on some footers, particularly Template:Biology-footer and Template:Genomics-footer. Making the table 100% particularly for the genomics footer makes the footer look very strange because there is only a small number of items, and having it stretched so much looks odd on most browsers. Since most page footers, such as country footers (such as Template:North America don't use width=100% (in fact most are indented by default), since this is a site-wide issue if you want to change things globally, you should probably discuss this on at Wikipedia talk:Page footers first. I reverted your changes pending discussion. Cheers, --Lexor|Talk 09:17, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Barocco siciliano

Ciao Archenzo, Congratulazioni - buon lavoro. Giano | talk 23:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Enzo, Scusilo. Ho pensato che traduceste il barocco siciliano. Giano | talk 07:23, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Periodic table

Template:Periodic table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:periodic table. Thank you. (You are notified as the creator of the template.) --Eddi (Talk) 21:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urgenza

Ho bisogno con urgenza che qualcuno blocchi l'utente Fotogian poichè rimuove i miei contributi firmati [Paolo esquilino] nella versione in italiano. Non so cosa voglia da me questo pericoloso schizoide ma bloccatelo e ripristinate i miei messaggi del 28 aprile in it:Discussioni utente:AmonSûl intitolato regolamento e in it:Discussioni utente:Ghino di Tacco intitolato commento. Ti saluto cordialmente certo della tua collaborazione. [Paolo esquilino] 28 apr —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.33.94.90 (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Basta leggere quanto scrive Fabexplosive al termine di questo paragrafo http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Votazioni_sulla_messa_al_bando/IVO#Commenti

Fotogian

visto--Arch Enzo 12:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Test redirect.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Test redirect.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status Your image, Image:Flammulina velutipes.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 17:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Test--ArchEnzo 21:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Archenzo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Archenzo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Archenzo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Archenzo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Archenzo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ortisei e Bressanone

Ciao, tu sei amminisratore su it.wiki da molti anni quindi hai esperienza: devo segnalarti un caso. Un utente pretende di mettere nomi alle città, che stanno in Italia, come gli pare a lui infatti Ortisei e Bressanone le avevo sistemate spostandole ai titoli corretti che corrispondono ai nomi ufficiali delle città. Puoi leggere la discussione in User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao#Names of towns ma quell'utente prende a pretesto una regola che ha inteso nel modo sbagliato. Io gli ho mostrato i siti ufficiali dei comuni nei quali Ortisei ha il nome solo in lingua italiana mentre Bressanone ha il nome Brixen-Bressanone quindi io avevo spostato i titoli ai nomi ufficiali, ma quello continua imperterrito nella sua elugubrazione eliminando i nomi in lingua italiana: quell'utente dev'essere fermato da un amministratore di en.wiki che tu puoi avvisare. Salve Staiolone (talk) 19:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Staiolone: ciao, a mio parere, ma posso sbagliare, il fatto che in itwiki Brixen è un redirect a Bressanone (semplicemente Bressanone) giustifica pienamente la medesima organizzazione dei link in tutte le altre lingue, Bressanone è dal novembre 1918 città italiana. Dovrebbe adottarla anche dewiki, che vedo chiama tutte le città italiane dell'Alto Adige in tedesco. ArchEnzo 20:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

il simpaticone utente Mai-Sachme ha segnalato il caso in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Staiolone quindi, caro Archenzo, ti rivolgo invito a lasciare un tuo parere in quella pagina, se hai tempo. Ciao--Staiolone (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]