Jump to content

Talk:Skene's gland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reverting to a previous version

[edit]

Headbomb, regarding this? I wouldn't have reverted that far back. Saidmann and Zefr did improve the article, and I'm okay with this version. After reviewing the changes, can you be okay with that version? Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly indifferent, just against the spurious removal of sources based on flawed logic. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I restored the article to the improved version. I will certainly report support you on any unjust removals. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely meant "support", not "report." Sorry about that. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Support you on arguing against, reverting, and/or reporting any unjust removals." Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

I don't know squat about phonetics or how these IPA templates work, but to me the pronunciations in the IPAc-en template (which suggests the vowel sound is like the I in kind) and the respell (SKEEN) are not consistent with each other. We may want to also check the IPA template at Alexander Skene. Larry Hockett (Talk) 13:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Stunningly) strange picture of a vulva

[edit]

The photo of a vulva that is used for this topic is very unclear. What do we see? The hole of the vagina is not perpendicular under the clitoris as is the case in almost 100% of women, but somewhere on the right. How are people supposed to understand this picture? The same picture is used for Bartholin's gland.

Marijn17 (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to find us a better one that we can legally use on WP. We would welcome it. MartinezMD (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, that's not so easy... A photograph of a vulva with explanations is even harder to find than a copyright-free image of a vulva. (And I'm not quite ready to use a photo of my own ;) Yet I think an image of a penis this unclear wouldn't be used in the first place. Vulva's are less (visibly) known, it's a fact, and this way it will not change... Marijn17 (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]