Talk:Fort Sill

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Base Realignment and Closure

According to KVIA ABC-7 News (El Paso, TX), Fort Bliss is slated to gain just over 11,000 troops if the proposed Base Realignment and Closure model is approved by President George W. Bush. Fort Bliss would lose its Air Defense Artillary and the ADA School, which would be moved to Fort Sill, Oklahoma. TomStar81 05:13, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

well thats a dun deal including moving the ADA museum, but this thing needs a lot of work, no mention of post field ect. I just cant decide if post field should have its own airport article. Brian in denver (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Free world?

Is "free world" in this context equal to "United States", or does it have a more symbolic meaning? — JIP | Talk 05:45, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It actually seems a bit biased to me, but I don't know the exacts of the statement.--FDIS 08:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is revisionist/rightwing-perspective! Many sources say that reasons for the comanche, kiowa and southern cheyenne resistance was starvation on the reservation. Many sources mention high corruption of indian agencies in that time. Many indians got to few food and often, its quality wasn´t good too. The bad conditions on the reservation were also a reason for the escape of northern cheyenne led by Dull Nife and Lone Star in 1878. They jsut wanted to return to their home in the northern plains, but got persecuted brutally by the US-Armee. Steve Ackermann 15/8/07

This page is highly biased

This page is highly biased the only three sources are government sources. The article refers to American Indians (Native Americans) and Indians. I do not believe that people from India waged war on Fort Sill. The U.S. government is also not known for admitting mistakes in fact many history textbooks in public schools are still using incorrect historical data for the conquest against the American Indian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verbicheck (talk • contribs) 19:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go there and tell the indians to stop calling themselves Indians.--166.205.137.116 (talk) 07:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Activities "Today" Section

ironically, this section is out of date. The info included is sparse and choppy. At a minImum, this section should explain the tenants on post (FORSCOM, TRADOC, IMCOM, Air Force, USMC, etc., and it should include information about the Fires Center of Excellence and its mission.--166.205.137.116 (talk) 07:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trader post scandal

Fort Sill (1876) was involved in a trader post scandal. I believe information on the scandal needs to be put in the article. John S. Evans, post trader at Fort Sill, split profits with Carita Belknap, wife of Secretary of War, William W. Belknap, and Caleb Marsh.

Inline citations needed

This article needs far more inline citations, especially in sections dealing with conflicts with Native Americans.Rogermx (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MOFN

Has anyone checked what you get when opening up the coördinates in Google Maos? Can this be fixed to show the actual base rather than a big stretch of nothing much? Or is there some reason why the coords locate to that particular spot? --Pete (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article classification

This article meets the requirements for Class C. I have made the change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Base Geographic Size

Out to include how physically big the base is ? (in acre or hectare, or square mile)? Re- the MOFN section./ I see what he means, however if you zoom out enough - there is a chance this is the geographic center of the base- if the Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge is also part of the base. The is where the conduct Artillery training - need a lot of open empty space for impact range when firing (Danger- Do not enter, possible unexploded ordnance is present. Wfoj3 (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Sill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100609010022/http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/spdes-123-ra_ar.html to http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/spdes-123-ra_ar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]